Table 1 |
||
|
Frequencies of Responses to Questions on Needle Exchange |
||
| Item |
N |
% |
|
|
||
| Agencies currently offering needle exchange (n = 40 agencies) |
5 |
12.5 |
| Agencies that considered offering it |
12 |
34 |
|
|
||
| Considered it, but decided against it because (n = 21 respondents) |
||
| Little/no perceived need/demand |
4 |
19.0 |
| service already provided locally |
4 |
19.0 |
| staff resistance |
1 |
4.8 |
| anticipated community opposition |
3 |
14.3 |
| Lack of funding |
2 |
9.5 |
| presently being considered |
2 |
9.5 |
| Don't know |
9 |
42.9 |
| Other |
3 |
14.3 |
|
|
||
| In agencies not offering needle exchange (n = 59 respondents) |
||
| Intra-agency obstacles |
||
| Little/no perceived need/demand |
12 |
22.0 |
| Lack of medical staff |
5 |
8.5 |
| Lack of funding |
7 |
11.9 |
| service already provided locally |
6 |
10.2 |
| staff resistance |
3 |
5.1 |
| contravenes agency's policy/philosophy |
2 |
3.4 |
| outside mandate/not a medical facility |
5 |
8.5 |
| Lack of staff |
8 |
13.6 |
| Don't know |
1 |
1.7 |
| Other |
27 |
45.8 |
| None |
8 |
13.6 |
| Extra-agency obstacles |
||
| community resistance/opposition |
31 |
52.5 |
| resistance/opposition from other agencies |
3 |
5.1 |
| Lack of local political support |
3 |
5.1 |
| funding |
2 |
3.4 |
| it would be seen as a duplication of services |
1 |
1.7 |
| May be seen as promoting drug use. |
12 |
20.3 |
| Don't know |
2 |
3.4 |
| Other |
6 |
10.2 |
| None |
8 |
13.6 |
| Expected benefits of needle exchange |
||
| None |
3 |
5.1 |
| reduction in HIV/STDs |
35 |
59.3 |
| might encourage IV drug users to seek counseling |
17 |
28.8 |
| community safety |
7 |
11.9 |
| greater accessibility/convenience for IV drug users |
7 |
11.9 |
| fallows for greater openness about drug use |
3 |
5.1 |
| Don't know |
3 |
5.1 |
| Other |
25 |
42.4 |
|
|
||
| For agencies that offer needle exchange (n = 8) |
||
| Reasons for introducing it |
||
| Reduce the spread of HIV/STDs |
4 |
50.0 |
| urged to by AIDS committee/Ministry/other agencies |
1 |
12.5 |
| funding was made available |
1 |
12.5 |
| Other |
4 |
50.0 |
| Resistance encountered |
||
| None |
5 |
62.5 |
| From the staff |
1 |
12.5 |
| From the Board |
1 |
12.5 |
| From the general community |
4 |
50.0 |
| How was it dealt with? |
||
| negotiation/conciliation |
1 |
12.5 |
| through education/information |
1 |
12.5 |
| Don't know |
1 |
12.5 |
| Other |
1 |
12.5 |
|
|
||
|
Hobden and Cunningham Harm Reduction Journal 2006 3:35 doi:10.1186/1477-7517-3-35 |
||