HRJ

official impact factor 1.46

Open Access Research

The acceptability of nicotine containing products as alternatives to cigarettes: findings from two pilot studies

Ron Borland1*, Lin Li1, Kevin Mortimer2, Ann McNeil2, Bill King1 and Richard J O'Connor3

Author Affiliations

1 VicHealth Center for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton 3053, Australia

2 Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

3 Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Harm Reduction Journal 2011, 8:27 doi:10.1186/1477-7517-8-27

Published: 12 October 2011

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to explore issues that might impact on the acceptability and feasibility of offering smokers nicotine containing products either to quit nicotine use altogether by using as a short term means of quitting cigarettes or as a longer term substitute.

Method

Two small pilot studies, one in the UK (n = 34) involving face to face contact and direct provision of the product, the other in Australia (n = 31) conducted remotely with products sent in the mail.

Results

Nicotine lozenges were the most popular products, but significant minorities liked a smokeless product more. Use stimulated interest in quitting, and although many failed to use all the products provided, most were interested in future use, more often to help quit than as a planned long-term substitute.

Conclusions

These studies indicate an untapped interest in the use of substitutes to reduce the harmfulness of smoking. Studies of this sort do not inhibit interest in quitting nicotine altogether, and may facilitate it. The greater the range of products on offer, the more smokers are likely to try a product to quit.