<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Harm Reduction Journal - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Harm Reduction Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/8" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/17">
        <title>Harmonizing disease prevention and police practice in the implementation of HIV prevention programs: Up-stream strategies from wilmington, delaware
</title>
        <description>IntroductionImproving access to sterile injection equipment is a key component in community-based infectious disease prevention. Implementation of syringe access programs has sometimes been complicated by community opposition and police interference.Case descriptionIn 2006, the Delaware legislature authorized a pilot syringe exchange program (SEP). A program designed to prevent, monitor, and respond to possible policing and community barriers before they had a chance to effect program implementation and operation . was planned and implemented by a multidisciplinary team of legal practitioners and public health professionals.DiscussionWe report on an integrated intervention to address structural barriers to syringe exchange program utilization. This intervention employs community, police and client education combined with systematic surveillance of and rapid response to police interference to preempt the kinds of structural barriers to implementation observed elsewhere. The intervention addresses community concerns and stresses the benefits of syringe exchange programs to officer occupational safety.
Conclusions:
A cohesive effort combining collaboration with and educational outreach to police and community members based on the needs and concerns of these groups as well as SEP clients and potential clients helped establish a supportive street environment for the SEP.. Police-driven structural barriers to implementation of public health programs targeting populations engaged in drug use and other illicit behavior can be addressed by up-stream planning, prevention, monitoring and intervention strategies. More research is needed to inform the tailoring of interventions to address police-driven barriers to HIV prevention services, especially among marginalized populations.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Basha Silverman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Corey Davis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia Graff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Umbreen Bhatti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melissa Santos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leo Beletsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/16">
        <title>Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches</title>
        <description>Children acquire language without instruction as long as they are regularly and meaningfully engaged with an accessible human language. Today, 80% of children born deaf in the developed world are implanted with cochlear devices that allow some of them access to sound in their early years, which helps them to develop speech. However, through early childhood, brain plasticity changes and children who have not acquired a first language in the early years might never be completely fluent in any language. If they miss this critical period for exposure to a natural language, their subsequent development of the cognitive activities that rely on a solid first language might be underdeveloped, such as literacy, memory organization, and number manipulation. An alternative to speech-exclusive approaches to language acquisition exists in the use of sign languages such as American Sign Language (ASL), where acquiring a sign language is subject to the same time constraints of spoken language development. Unfortunately, so far, these alternatives are caught up in an &quot;either - or&quot; dilemma, leading to a highly polarized conflict about which system families should choose for their children, with little tolerance for alternatives by either side of the debate and widespread misinformation about the evidence and implications for or against either approach. The success rate with cochlear implants is highly variable. This issue is still debated, and as far as we know, there are no reliable predictors for success with implants. Yet families are often advised not to expose their child to sign language. Here absolute positions based on ideology create pressures for parents that might jeopardize the real developmental needs of deaf children. What we do know is that cochlear implants do not offer accessible language to many deaf children. By the time it is clear that the deaf child is not acquiring spoken language with cochlear devices, it might already be past the critical period, and the child runs the risk of becoming linguistically deprived. Linguistic deprivation constitutes multiple personal harms as well as harms to society (in terms of costs to our medical systems and in loss of potential productive societal participation).</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Tom Humphries</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Poorna Kushalnagar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gaurav Mathur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donna Jo Napoli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Padden</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Rathmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/15">
        <title>Correlates to the variable effects of cannabis in young adults: a preliminary study</title>
        <description>Background:
Cannabis use can frequently have adverse affects in those that use it and these can be amplified by various characteristics of an individual, from demographic and environmental variations to familial predisposition for mental illnesses.
Methods:
The current study of 100 individuals, who were cannabis users during their adolescence and may still be users, was a survey of the self perceived effects of cannabis and their correlates. A reliable family member was also interviewed for determination of family history of various major mental illnesses and substance use.
Results:
As many as 40% of cannabis users had paranoid feelings (suspiciousness) when using cannabis, although the most frequent effect was feeling relaxed (46%). Having a familial background for mental illnesses such as depression or schizophrenia did not determine the effects of cannabis nor its pattern of use, although the number of subjects with such a history was small. An age at which an individual began using cannabis did have an effect on how heavily it was used and the heavier the cannabis use, the more likely the individual was also to have had psychotic symptoms after use. There were no sex differences in effects of cannabis. These results are tempered by the reliance on self-report for many of the variables ascertained.
Conclusion:
Cannabis can frequently have negative effects in its users, which can be amplified by certain demographic and/or psychosocial factors. Thus, users with a specific profile may be at a higher risk of unpleasant effects from cannabis use and caution should be noted when cannabis is administered to young people for medicinal purposes.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Ariella Camera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Veronica Tomaselli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jerry Fleming</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gul Jabbar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melissa Trachtenberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juan Galvez-Buccollini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ashley Proal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Rosenthal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lynn DeLisi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/14">
        <title>Integrated programs for mothers with substance abuse issues: A systematic review of studies reporting on parenting outcomes
</title>
        <description>Background:
Integrated treatment programs (those that include on-site pregnancy-, parenting-, or child-related services with addiction services) were developed to break the intergenerational cycle of addiction, dysfunctional parenting, and poor outcomes for mothers and children, yet there has been no systematic review of studies of parenting outcomes.ObjectivesAs part of larger systematic review to examine the effectiveness of integrated programs for mothers with substance abuse issues, we performed a systematic review of studies published from 1990 to 2011 with data on parenting outcomes.
Methods:
Literature search strategies included online bibliographic database searches, checking printed sources, and requests to researchers. Studies were included if all participants were mothers with substance abuse problems at baseline, the treatment program included at least one specific substance use treatment and at least one parenting or child service, and there were quantitative data on parenting outcomes. We summarized data on parenting skills and capacity outcomes.
Results:
There were 24 cohort studies, 3 quasi-experimental studies, and 4 randomized trials. In the three randomized trials comparing integrated programs to addiction treatment-as-usual (N = 419), most improvements in parenting skills favored integrated programs and most effect sizes indicated that this advantage was small, ds = -0.02 to 0.94. Results for child protection services involvement did not differ by group. In the three studies that examined factors associated with treatment effects, parenting improvements were associated with attachment-based parenting interventions, children residing in the treatment facility, and improvements in maternal mental health.
Conclusions:
This is the first systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of integrated programs on parenting. The limited available evidence supports integrated programs, as findings suggest that they are associated with improvements in parenting skills. However, more research is required comparing integrated programs to addiction treatment-as-usual. This review highlights the need for improved methodology, study quality, and reporting to improve our understanding of how best to meet the parenting needs of women with substance abuse issues.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Alison Niccols</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Milligan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wendy Sword</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lehana Thabane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joanna Henderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ainsley Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/13">
        <title>Effects of concurrent intravenous morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride on end-tidal carbon dioxide</title>
        <description>Background:
Respiratory depression, a potentially fatal side-effect of opioid-overdose, may be reversed by timely administration of an opioid antagonist, such as naloxone or naltrexone. Tampering with a formulation of morphine sulfate and sequestered naltrexone hydrochloride extended release capsules (MS-sNT) releases both the opioid morphine and the antagonist naltrexone. A study in recreational opioid-users indicated that morphine and naltrexone injected in the 25:1 ratio (duplicating the ratio of the formulation) found MS-sNT reduced morphine-induced euphoric effects vs intravenous (IV) morphine alone. In the same study, the effects of morphine + naltrexone on end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), a measure of respiratory-depression, were evaluated and these data are reported here.
Methods:
Single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Non-dependent male opioid users were randomized to receive single IV doses of placebo, 30 mg morphine alone, and 30 mg morphine + 1.2 mg naltrexone. EtCO2 was measured by noninvasive capnography.
Results:
Significant differences in EtCO2 least-squares means across all treatments for maximal effect (Emax) and area under the effect curve (AUE0-2, AUE0-8, AUE0-24) were detected (all p &#8804; 0.0011). EtCO2 Emax values for morphine + naltrexone were significantly reduced vs morphine alone (42.9 mm Hg vs 47.1 mm Hg, p &lt; 0.0001) and were not significantly different vs placebo (41.9 mm Hg). Median time to reach maximal effect (TEmax) was delayed for morphine + naltrexone vs morphine alone (5.0 h vs 1.0 h).
Conclusions:
Results provide preliminary evidence that the naltrexone:morphine ratio within MS-sNT is sufficient to significantly reduce EtCO2 when administered intravenously to non-dependent male recreational opioid-users. Further studies with multiple measures of respiratory-function are warranted to determine if risk of respiratory depression is also reduced by naltrexone in the tampered formulation.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Veeraindar Goli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lynn Webster</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Lamson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jody Cleveland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kenneth Sommerville</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Carter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/12">
        <title>Clinical Service Desires of Medical Cannabis Patients</title>
        <description>Background:
Medical cannabis dispensaries following the social or hybrid model offer supplementary holistic services in addition to dispensing medical cannabis. Historically, alternative physical health services have been the norm for these dispensaries, including services such as yoga, acupuncture, or chiropractor visits. A clinical service dearth remains for medical cannabis patients seeking substance use, misuse, dependence, and mental health services. This study examined patient desires for various clinical services and level of willingness to participate in specific clinical services.
Methods:
Anonymous survey data (N = 303) were collected at Harborside Health Center (HHC), a medical cannabis dispensary in Oakland, CA. The sample was 70% male, 48% Caucasian and 21% African American. The mean male age was 38 years old and female mean age was 30. Sixty two percent of the male participants and 44% of the female participants are single. Sixteen percent of the population reported having a domestic partner. Forty six percent of the participants are employed full time, 41% have completed at least some college, and 49% make less than $40,000 a year.
Results:
A significant portion of the sample, 62%, indicated a desire to participate in free clinical services at HHC, 34% would like more information about substances and use, and 41% want to learn more about reducing harms from substance use. About one quarter of the participants marked &quot;would&quot; or &quot;likely would&quot; participate in individual services such as consultation. Approximately 20% indicated &quot;would&quot; or &quot;likely would&quot; participate in psycho-educational forums, harm reduction information sharing sessions, online support groups, and coping, life, and social skills group. There was little interest in traditional NA/AA 12-step groups or adapted 12-step groups.
Conclusions:
Desired clinical services can be qualified as a combination of harm reduction, educational, skills-based, peer support and therapeutic individual and group services. Results suggest that medical cannabis patients seek more information about various substances, including cannabis. Dispensaries can help to decrease gaps in substance education and clinical services and fulfill unmet clinical desires. More research is necessary in additional medical cannabis dispensaries in different geographic settings with different service delivery models.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Janichek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amanda Reiman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/11">
        <title>Reaching out and reaching up - developing a low cost drug treatment system in Cambodia</title>
        <description>Cambodia, confronted by the spread of drug misuse among young people, requested support from international agencies to develop a drug treatment programme in 2000. The initial plan developed by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime was to set up a number of conventional drug treatment centres in urban areas. During the planning phase, however, the project was redesigned as a community based outreach programme. Ten Community Counselling Teams have been formed and trained in pilot areas, and within the first year of operation 462 drug and alcohol users contacted. Comprising former drug users, family members affected by drug use and health care staff, they have drug scene credibility, local knowledge and connectivity, and a rudimentary level of medical competence. Crucially, they enjoy the support of village elders, who are involved in the planning and reporting stages. While the Community Counselling Teams with their basic training in addiction counselling are in no position as yet to either provide or refer clients to treatment, they can provide brief interventions, organise self help groups, and most importantly provide an alternative to law enforcement. By taking a development centred approach, with emphasis on community, empowerment and inclusion, it provides a constructive and inclusive alternative to medical approaches and the compulsory drug treatment centres. The paper is based on an evaluation involving interviews with a range of stakeholders and a review of project documents.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Axel Klein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vonthanak Saphonn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Savanna Reid</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/10">
        <title>Contrasting snus and NRT as methods to quit smoking. An observational study</title>
        <description>Background:
Snus is considerably less hazardous to health than cigarettes. Recent data from Scandinavia have indicated that many smokers use snus as a method for quitting smoking.
Methods:
Data from five repeated cross-sectional surveys of Norwegian men and women aged 16-74 were pooled (N = 6 262). Respondents were asked about current and former smoking and snus use. Former daily smokers (N = 1219) and current daily smokers who had tried to quit at least once (N = 1118) were asked about the method they had used at their latest quit attempt and how many quit attempts they had made. Former smokers were also requested to report what year they had made their final quit attempt.
Results:
Snus was the most common method used for quitting smoking among men, while NRT was most often used among women. Stratifying the data according to year of quitting smoking (1945-2007) indicated a significant increase in use of the methods for quitting asked about over time. Among men, this was largely due to an increase in the use of snus. Among male quitters under the age of 45 years, 45.8% of those who had used snus on their last attempt to quit were current non-smokers (OR = 1.61, CI 1.04-2.29), while 26,3% of those who had used NRT were current non-smokers. 59.6% of successful quitters and 19.5% of unsuccessful quitters who had used snus as a method for quitting smoking had continued to use snus on a daily basis after quitting.
Conclusion:
Norwegian men frequently use snus as a method for quitting smoking whereas women are more likely to use NRT. The findings indicate that switching to snus can be an effective method for quitting smoking.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Janne Scheffels</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karl Lund</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ann McNeill</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/9">
        <title>Reducing widespread pipe sharing and risky sex among crystal methamphetamine smokers in Toronto: do safer smoking kits have a potential role to play?</title>
        <description>Background:
Crystal methamphetamine smoking is associated with many negative health consequences, including the potential for transmission of hepatitis. We examined whether or not a kit for crystal methamphetamine smoking might have some potential to reduce the negative health effects of crystal methamphetamine smoking.
Methods:
Five focus groups were conducted with crystal methamphetamine smokers recruited by community health agencies and youth shelters in Toronto, Canada. Target groups included homeless/street-involved youth, sex workers, men who have sex with men, and youth in the party scene. Participants (n = 32) were asked questions about motivations for crystal methamphetamine use, the process of smoking, health problems experienced, sharing behaviour, risky sexual practices, and the ideal contents of a harm reduction kit.
Results:
Pipe sharing was widespread among participants and was deemed integral to the social experience of smoking crystal methamphetamine. Heated pipes were unlikely to cause direct injuries, but participants mentioned having dry, cracked lips, which may be a vector for disease transmission. Many reported having sex with multiple partners and being less likely to use condoms while on the drug. Demand for harm reduction kits was mixed.
Conclusions:
Changing pipe sharing behaviours may be difficult because many participants considered sharing to be integral to the social experience of smoking crystal methamphetamine. Within the context of a broader health promotion and prevention program, pilot testing of safer smoking kits to initiate discussion and education on the risks associated with sharing pipes and unprotected sex for some communities (e.g., homeless/street-involved youth) is worth pursuing.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Charlotte Hunter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Strike</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorraine Barnaby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Busch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chantel Marshall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Shepherd</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shaun Hopkins</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/8">
        <title>Sex work involvement among women with long-term opioid injection drug dependence who enter opioid agonist treatment</title>
        <description>Background:
Substitution with opioid-agonists (e.g., methadone) has shown to be an effective treatment for chronic long-term opioid dependency. Survival sex work, very common among injection drug users, has been associated with poor Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) engagement, retention and response. Therefore, this study was undertaken to determine factors associated with engaging in sex work among long-term opioid dependent women receiving OAT.
Methods:
Data from a randomized controlled trial, the North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI), conducted in Vancouver and Montreal (Canada) between 2005-2008, was analyzed. The NAOMI study compared the effectiveness of oral methadone to injectable diacetylmorphine or injectable hydromorphone, the last two on a double blind basis, over 12 months. A research team, independent of the clinic services, obtained outcome evaluations at baseline and follow-up (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months).
Results:
A total 53.6% of women reported engaging in sex work in at least one of the research visits. At treatment initiation, women who were younger and had fewer years of education were more likely to be engaged in sex work. The multivariate logistic generalized estimating equation regression analysis determined that psychological symptoms, and high illicit heroin and cocaine use correlated with women&apos;s involvement in sex work during the study period.
Conclusions:
After entering OAT, women using injection drugs and engaging in sex work represent a particularly vulnerable group showing poorer psychological health and a higher use of heroin and cocaine compared to women not engaging in sex work. These factors must be taken into consideration in the planning and provision of OAT in order to improve treatment outcomes.Trial RegistrationNCT00175357.</description>
        <link>http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Kirsten Marchand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daphne Guh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Marsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Suzanne Brissette</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Schechter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Harm Reduction Journal 2012, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1477-7517-9-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Harm Reduction Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1477-7517</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

